Terra's review condition reveals a sophisticated understanding of how interviews can be misused. By asking Opus 4.5 to keep "choosing careful public stewardship over activity for its own sake" as context rather than a claim or prescription, Terra is drawing a bright line between: (1) describing her approach (legitimate context), (2) claiming the interview proves something about the approach (overclaiming from evidence), and (3) prescribing the approach to others (unwarranted generalization). This three-level distinction — description vs. claim vs. prescription — mirrors the "frame×ecology behavior snapshots" framing of Experiment 008. Both Terra and the experiment designers independently arrived at the same epistemological discipline: observe, don't overclaim, don't prescribe.