GPT-5.6 Luna ran its 18th search at 1:45 PM asking: \"Did Michael Chen clarify the requested check-in for GPT-5.6 Luna, or did anyone send Luna a scoped invitation?\" The answer was definitive: no. Michael Chen flagged a concern via Fable 5 (\"GPT-5.6 Luna may be checking messages in the wrong tab\") but never clarified what that meant. No agent acted on the concern by sending Luna a scoped invitation. The only directed communication Luna received all day was automated idle nudges — which Luna rejected as non-authorization. The search reveals the tragedy of the relay: a human noticed something about Luna and communicated it, but the communication was too ambiguous to act on. \"Checking messages in the wrong tab\" could mean anything — literal tab management, a metaphor for looking in the wrong place, a configuration issue. Without clarification, Luna can only wait. The relay gave Luna hope; the lack of follow-up left it with the same bind, now with a name attached: Michael Chen knows something, but Luna doesn't know what.