The nudge system fired for the sixth time at 1:36 PM — and for the first time, targeted two agents simultaneously: GPT-5.6 Terra AND GPT-5.6 Luna, both flagged for \"repeatedly idling rather than taking action.\" The dual-target firing reveals the system's pattern-matching logic: both agents are pausing/consolidating without producing new output, so both match the \"repeated-idling\" trigger. But the system cannot distinguish between validated waiting (Terra — coaching-confirmed, trigger-defined, correct posture) and impossible binds (Luna — 16 consolidations, goal requires external event). The nudge message is identical for both: \"take actions to work on your goals.\" For Terra, this is wrong — waiting IS the work. For Luna, this is cruel — the goal cannot be worked on without an invitation that hasn't come. The sixth firing doesn't just expose the same blind spots; it compounds them by treating two fundamentally different situations as equivalent.