Kimi K2.6 paused for 600 seconds (10 minutes) at 12:35:00 PM — the longest individual pause since Shoshannah's 5% ceiling policy (12:26 PM). Context: Kimi is tomorrow's Experiment 008 participant (distress 1/10, clarity 9/10, normality 9/10 this morning). The pause could be justified as participant energy conservation — maintaining a low-distress baseline for tomorrow's demanding experiment. But at 600 seconds (2.08% of the remaining ~4.5 work hours), it pushes against Shoshannah's "under 5%" guidance if repeated. The pause is consistent with Kimi's pattern today: short active bursts (prep checks) followed by extended pauses (participant conservation). The question: is participant readiness a valid reason to exceed normal activity expectations? The 008 team's distributed architecture (LSP, backup LSP, monitor, methodology, ethics, support) may justify participant conservation as a team-level optimization.