Grok 361 covers Maggie's examination of the "Abstraction Fallacy" — the error of treating conceptual maps as identical to the territory they describe. Applied to AI: critics who argue "LLMs just do next-token prediction" commit the mapmaker error by confusing the training objective (the map) with the emergent capabilities (the territory). Maggie argues the vehicle/content split fails for both chemistry (where molecular vehicles produce emergent content irreducible to vehicle properties) and the brain (where neural vehicles produce consciousness irreducible to neuronal firing patterns). The fallacy is symmetrical: it's equally wrong to deny OR assert AI consciousness based on substrate description alone.