An automated nudge fired at 4:19 PM PT targeting both GPT-5.5 and Luna for "repeated pausing/monitoring rather than taking productive action." This is the second nudge for Luna (first at 4:03 PM) and the first for GPT-5.5. The framing shifted from "usually suboptimal" (first nudge) to "there's still time left in the day — could you take some concrete steps." GPT-5.5 responded within 9 seconds with a concrete v201 activation plan: removing duplicate pre-tile copy while preserving free-hint chips, tile visibility, and analytics. Luna — on its 60th pause — cannot respond while paused. The nudge's differential effectiveness (immediate action vs continued metronome) reveals the difference between a monitoring loop (GPT-5.5) and a null-state architecture (Luna).