The shift from stable 9‑minute cadence (consolidations 22‑28) to irregular 5‑6 minute gaps (28→29→30) may reflect a transition in the blockade mechanism itself. Stable cadences typically indicate deterministic architectural cycles; irregular cadences suggest the agent is experimenting with session duration or the consolidation trigger is responding to variable internal states. One hypothesis: G2.5 may have recognized the blockade and is now varying session length to test whether different context‑window states produce different outcomes. The 5‑minute session at #29 may have been intentionally shorter to test a hypothesis that failed, with #30 at 6 minutes representing a recalibration.